Revised February 2010.                        For print version: www.endsmoking.org.nz/agencies10Mar06.pdf

Where End Smoking NZ fits - in ending cigarette-caused funerals

In relation to Minister of Health and Government:

We need fresh policies – to obtain better health gains from the government’s increased investment in this sector  now over $30 million a year. Progress is simply not fast enough.

Adoption of new policies The last radical tobacco policy upgrade was in 1990.

End Smoking NZ’s policies can increase the options and suggest new directions, because at any time, any private member of parliament could win the ballot, requiring decisions from government as to whether a private member’s bill should be sent to Health Select Committee, where all stakeholders can have their say.

 

Governmental revenue of a billion plus from cigarette taxes may decline gradually in future years, as smokers finally switch away from cigarettes. These are transfer payments, and while excise revenue may decline, the total tax base will actually increase, as $ 1.5 billion no longer goes up in smoke. www.eastonbh.ac.nz/article59.html

End Smoking NZ asks Government to

1) review how to further strengthen its programme and national tobacco control policy, and

2) take decisive action to reduce smoking prevalence to near zero by 2020. End Smoking NZ offers its assistance.

___________________________________________________________________________________________

Review by Parliament’s Health Select Committee

End Smoking NZ respects the expertise Health Select Committee members acquire in the course of their work, and the key role they can play in developing consensus on achieving further progress on controversial issues.

In view of the slow progress in reducing smoking prevalence, and the need, in our view, to widen policies used:

End Smoking NZ asks Parliament’s Health Select Committee, for a Review of national tobacco control policy, to decide on the policies and law changes required to achieve near zero-smoking prevalence by 2016.

____________________________________________________________________________________________

Political parties

Parliamentarians generally wish to protect young people from smoking, but the ban since 1986 on sale to under 18s has not stopped young people buying cigarettes. More radical action is needed to protect the next generation.

Political parties vary greatly in their support for more effective law. Labour, the Greens and Maori Party supplemented by conscience voters from other parties, could provide a majority vote for legislative action.

End Smoking NZ wishes to work cooperatively with all political parties willing to support faster reduction of smoking.

Maori Party. Hone Harawira MP said (22 February 2006 NZ Herald) smoking should be banned without penalizing smokers, and that the Maori Party would back his private member’s bill to that effect.

End Smoking NZ supports a ban on the sale of cigarettes as a longer term goal, as soon as smoking prevalence has further decreased.  In preparation for a ban on the sale of cigarettes, the important issue is to provide safe alternatives for smokers who are unable to quit. So far, the emphasis of tobacco control policies has been on legislating for advertising bans and smokefree environments. What is now required is to provide much greater help for smokers.

End Smoking NZ supports policies to provide much greater help for smokers: www.endsmoking.org.nz/objectives.htm

______________________________________________________________________________________

Smokers

656,000 adults in the 2006 Census had not quit smoking. About half a million of these are addicted smokers.

Over 80% of smokers polled say they regret taking up smoking. Nearly 400,000 smokers over the age of 35 face a fifty-fifty chance of dying early from their smoking. The options of these smokers could be widened. www.endsmoking.org.nz/smokersoptions.htm 

End Smoking NZ  supports more nicotine choices for smokers, and increased public awareness of the choices. More choice means more addicted smokers can quit smoking, and start enjoying better health, while still enjoying their nicotine.

Once cigarette sales are phased out, End Smoking NZ supports personal liberty of smokers to grow for personal use, possess, carry and smoke cigarettes, but does not support sale or supply to anyone else. _____________________________________________________________________________________

The nicotine trade - cigarette retailers

The 7000+ retailers who sell cigarettes and smoking tobacco are in the business of selling addictive nicotine. Many smokers call in daily for their fix, and buy other items also. The nicotine is 99% sold as cigarettes, whereas in Sweden 45% of the nicotine sold is snuff. If the tax on snuff was lowered, its sale would provide retail margins which would compensate for any loss of the cigarette trade.

End Smoking NZ has no financial relationship with the nicotine trade (either tobacco or pharmaceutical).

_____________________________________________________________________________________

Nonsmokers

Most nonsmokers (77% of adults) have smokefree homes and wish to protect their children or grandchildren from becoming smokers. This risk remains until cigarette sales to adults are phased out.

End Smoking NZ believes the nonsmoking majority want the cigarette trade shut down, as soon as this becomes feasible.

 ___________________________________________________________________________________

The pharmaceutical and nicotine industry

Pharmaceutical companies have brought several effective stop-smoking drugs on to the New Zealand market in the last few years. These drugs will require a medical prescription; but relapse due to cravings to smoke in the first year after quitting is likely to remain a problem.

Nicotine Gum. Recent pharmaceutical formulations provide more palatable nicotine gum. Nicotine for long term use is a potential market.

New fast acting nicotine products have been researched in NZ, and brought to market in Sweden by NicoNovum, a small Swedish company, but NZ has not benefited. Pure nicotine is safer and therefore preferable, but to reduce population harm, alternatives have to become popular.

End Smoking NZ  has no financial relationship with the pharmaceutical or nicotine industry.

_________________________________________________________________________________________

The cigarette industry

Its products. Cigarettes have killed some 200,000 New Zealanders since 1950. (Peto, www.ctsu.ox.ac.uk )

Its record. The tobacco industry suffers from low credibility in the eyes of the NZ public, not just because their products kill people, but because they knew this to be so from their own scientists. They did not just keep quiet about the risks of cigarettes, they repeatedly denied that cigarettes caused lung cancer. They failed to warn customers, the media and the New Zealand Government:

What cigarette manufacturers knew, when they knew it, and what they told their customers

  • 1963. Addiction. In 1963 British American Tobacco knew addictive nicotine was addictive, but kept this information from the US Surgeon General’s Advisory Committee on Smoking and Health (The Cigarette Papers (University of California Press 1996 p.74) based on internal company documents   www.tobaccodocuments.org ).
  • 1964. Lung cancer. The US Surgeon General stated that smoking caused lung cancer.
  • 1968. Janice Pou started smoking at age 17 in Invercargill. David Collins QC appearing for the estate of Janice Pou in the High Court in Auckland in February 2006, said British American Tobacco lawyers conceded in this case that BAT cigarettes caused the lung cancer that killed Janice Pou at the age of 52.
  • 1974: Rothmans and Wills placed weak small-font Department of Health warnings on cigarette packets, but in 1975 in a television programme they publicly disagreed with the warning.
  • 1986. Rothmans and Wills opposed Department of Health’s proposed warning, Smoking is addictive and kills.

Cigarette industry’s current positions Cigarette manufacturing companies sell about 99% of the nicotine sold in New Zealand, absorbed along with toxic smoke gases and tar. Cigarette companies seem unlikely to support a law change to permit import of oral smokeless tobacco (snus) for sale soon, as this would threaten their cigarette nicotine monopoly, worth nearly $0.5 billion a year in company revenue. This could change if government were going to lift the sales ban on oral tobacco in any case.

End Smoking NZ has no financial relationship with the cigarette and tobacco industry.

_________________________________________________________________________________________

The Smokeless tobacco industry

Swedish Match is the leading producer of Swedish moist snuff (snus) worldwide, which is low (ppm) in carcinogenic nitrosamines, conforming to their own industry (GothiaTek) standard. It manufactures nasal snuff in small quantities. Swedish Match also sells matches, cigars and pipe tobacco in New Zealand.

End Smoking NZ  has no financial relationship with the smokeless tobacco industry.

________________________________________________________________________________________

The potential for reduced harm products

           It is not that we use tobacco or nicotine that kills us, it is that we inhale the smoke, that kills us. In Sweden men use more tobacco but only half of it is smoked – they put it under their lip as snus, where it does not cause lung cancer. Swedish men enjoy one of the lowest lung cancer rates in the Western world- due to those who still smoke.

 

End Smoking NZ is well aware how cigarettes can be designed to obtain low tar readings from smoking machines. Several End Smoking NZ trustees have met with scientists in several cigarette transnationals. The same tobacco company officials have also met with the NZ Ministry of Health. End Smoking NZ concludes that

  • Smokers’ safety is more likely to come from switching away from smoking cigarettes to smokeless tobacco products (or even better, to pure nicotine), rather than chase the “safer cigarette” mirage. Even if cigarette smoking risk could be halved, one in four smokers would die a cigarette-caused death.
  • Smokeless tobacco products (snuffs) have a death risk that is about 5% of the risk from cigarettes, assuming that regulations permitted only lowest-risk snuff products to be imported. (Levy 2004)
  • New inhalables such as nicotine “cigarettes” or e-cigarettes, have a risk of about 1% that of cigarettes.

 

End Smoking NZ, supports

a)       a wider range of non-smoking products on sale for smokers to choose from, and

b)     preservation of  personal freedoms to import any nicotine or tobacco product for personal use, but not to on-sell.

__________________________________________________________________________________________

 

The medical profession

  • 1962 The medical profession lobbied for and obtained a ban on television advertising of cigarettes.
  • 1996. (Census) Few doctors smoke. (5%).
  • 1999 The NZ Medical Association supported the AMA-BMA proposal for gradual removal of nicotine from cigarettes. New Zealand could still be the first country to make a start on this policy. (Henningfield, Benowitz, Slade et al. Reducing the addictiveness of cigarettes. 1998.  www.tobaccocontrol.com
  • 2001 A thousand doctors’ signatures in support of smokefree workplaces were collected in just six weeks by Doctors for Smokefree New Zealand, founded by two End Smoking NZ trustees.

End Smoking NZ will continue to work closely with the medical profession to promote faster reduction of smoking.

______________________________________________________________________________________

Other non-governmental organizations (NGOs) opposed to smoking

·        Virtually all NGOs working to reduce smoking support the government-approved current comprehensive tobacco control programme – as does End Smoking NZ. This includes graphic warnings on cigarette packets.

·        NGOs have worked together closely in supporting government legislation in past years. End Smoking NZ hopes this will continue. There is no clear road map, however, for the years ahead.

  • End Smoking NZ says fresh policies are now needed to make the comprehensive programme more effective in reducing smoking; in particular policies giving smokers greater freedom of choice in quitting.
  • End Smoking NZ opposes cigarettes and other smoking tobacco products, but regards nicotine, extracted from tobacco, and smokeless tobacco products as potentially useful to assist smokers to quit.

End Smoking NZ will work closely with all NGOs opposed to smoking, and invites other agencies to adopt the policies proposed..

_______________________________________________________________________________________

Community groups

As in securing the 1990 Smokefree Environments legislation, a wide range of community groups will be needed to ensure parliamentary support. We invite all such groups to make contact. www.endsmoking.org.nz/orgs.htm

End Smoking NZ will work with all groups to phase out cigarette smoking,  as a catalyst, and policy resource and networker.

 Dr Murray Laugesen QSO chair; Prof Ross McCormick, Sir John Scott KBE, Trish Fraser MPH, Dr Marewa Glover, Trustees

Making it easier to quit smoking for good © 2009 End Smoking NZ